CyberSense is an Index Engines product that applies content-based analytics to backup data. In the Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery integration, the most common enterprise deployment, inspection runs after data lands in the vault. For organizations running that stack, it is a meaningful control. The question that deployment cannot answer: what entered the vault before inspection ran?
Elastio inspects before the vault boundary and again inside it, across live data, replicated data, and backups, and hunts across Commvault, Veeam, Rubrik, Cohesity, NetApp, S3, Blob, AWS Backup and more, regardless of where data lives.
Inspection location
Elastio inspects before the vault and again inside it in an isolated clean room. CyberSense runs only after data lands in the Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery vault.
Detection & output
Elastio's Deep File Inspection produces a named verdict per file: the ransomware family, the encryption pattern, and the last verified clean recovery point. CyberSense applies statistical and content-based features to backup data and surfaces anomalies for SOC review.
Backup coverage
Elastio is backup-agnostic across Commvault, Veeam, Rubrik, Cohesity, NetApp, S3, Blob, and AWS Backup. CyberSense is tightly coupled to PowerProtect Data Domain and the Cyber Recovery workflow.
Architecture
Elastio is cloud-native and auto-scaling across AWS, Azure, IBM Cloud, and on-prem. CyberSense uses a per-server architecture with an on-prem appliance footprint and no cloud-native orchestration.
Accuracy
Elastio's Hunt engine produces fewer than 5 false positives per 10 million files inspected, with no interpretation step and no threshold tuning.
Two architectures
Two architectures. One fundamental difference.
CyberSense and Elastio look at backup data from different positions in the pipeline. The architecture difference shows up in coverage, signal quality, and operational footprint.
CyberSense
“Does the data inside the vault look statistically anomalous?”
Runs analytics after data lands in the Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery vault
Statistical and content-based features applied to backup data post-replication
Tightly coupled to PowerProtect Data Domain and the Cyber Recovery workflow
Per-server architecture. No cloud-native orchestration
Deterministic verdict per file, per recovery point
Outcomeprovable recovery before corruption reaches the vault
Stages of Inspection
Where inspection happens determines what you can recover
Inspecting the vault tells you what already landed inside. Hunting at first write tells you what should never land in the vault.
In the Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery integration, CyberSense inspects only what has already landed in the vault. Elastio inspects before the data crosses the boundary, and again inside as an additional check.
Stage 1
Hunt at first write
Elastio inspects backup data before it is replicated into the vault. Corruption identified at this stage never lands inside the isolated tier. CyberSense has no equivalent control. Inspection begins only after vault ingress.
Stage 2
Hunt inside the vault, in a clean room
Elastio can also run Deep File Inspection inside the vault in an isolated clean room. No new accounts in the vault. No persistent compute. Inspection completes, results are written back, and the clean room is torn down.
Signal Quality
The volume of features is not the same as accuracy
CyberSense applies a large catalog of statistical features to backup content. A high feature count produces a high alert count. SOC teams running these tools at enterprise scale see this firsthand.
Statistical features carry false positives.
Compressed logs, database extents, encrypted application traffic, and routine content updates all generate signals that look like ransomware on a feature-by-feature basis. The result is alert volume that SOC teams cannot triage at scale.
Threshold tuning is endless.
Each estate requires calibration. Each upgrade cycle requires regression testing. Operational dependence on a single vendor product version becomes its own exposure.
Output requires SOC interpretation.
A flagged anomaly is not a named threat. SOC teams must determine whether the signal indicates ransomware, a benign content shift, or noise, which adds additional operational overhead to already-over-stretched teams.
Elastio produces a named, deterministic verdict.
Elastio's Hunt engine names the ransomware family, identifies the encryption pattern, and identifies the last verified clean copy to recover from. Fewer than 5 false positives per 10 million files inspected. No interpretation step. No tuning.
Capability Comparison
Side by side: what each product covers
Capability rows reflect Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery and Index Engines CyberSense public documentation as of May 2026.
Capability
CyberSense
Elastio
Architecture
Cloud-native, auto-scaling control plane
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Native parity across AWS, Azure, IBM Cloud, and on-prem
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Backup-agnostic across Commvault, Veeam, Rubrik, Cohesity, NetApp
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Tightly coupled to a single backup vendor stack
✓Covered
—Not in scope
Per-server architecture with manual load balancing
✓Covered
—Not in scope
Where Inspection Happens
Inspection before data lands in the vault
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Inspection inside the vault in an ephemeral, isolated clean room
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Inspection of live data on production systems
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Inspection of replicated data and snapshots
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Inspection of backup data
✓Covered
✓Covered
Detection Methodology
Deterministic per-file verdict vs. statistical scoring
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Statistical and content-based feature analysis
✓Covered
~Partial or scope-limited
Deterministic pass or fail per file, per recovery point
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Named threat output with ransomware family identification
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Intermittent encryption detection
~Partial or scope-limited
✓Covered
Low-entropy encryption detection
~Partial or scope-limited
✓Covered
Zero-day ransomware detection without known signature
~Partial or scope-limited
✓Covered
Operational Footprint
No new accounts or access paths into the vault
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Ephemeral compute. No persistent scanner infrastructure inside the vault
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Auto-scaling to zero when no Hunt jobs are queued
—Not in scope
✓Covered
SOC interpretation step required to determine threat type
✓Covered
—Not in scope
Threshold tuning required to manage false positive volume
✓Covered
—Not in scope
Recovery Assurance
Last Known Clean recovery point, continuously maintained
~Partial or scope-limited
✓Covered
Resilience RPO (R-RPO) measurement
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Provable recovery compliance reporting for regulators and auditors
—Not in scope
✓Covered
Recovery context survives loss of SaaS portal
~Partial or scope-limited
✓Covered
✓Covered
~Partial or scope-limited
—Not in scope
Proof of Concept
Run a detection gap assessment
Thirty minutes. Your data. Your existing detection in place. We show you exactly what your current control catches and what it does not.
01
Your current CyberSense deployment runs against a data set containing intermittent and low-entropy encrypted files, alongside benign content known to trigger statistical features. You see what it surfaces and how the alerts look to your SOC.
02
Elastio Hunt Engine runs against the same data, before vault ingress and inside the vault. Corruption is confirmed. The Last Known Clean recovery point is identified. The ransomware family is named.
03
Side by side output. Alert volume, false positive count, confirmed clean recovery point, named threat detail, and R-RPO exposure. Documented. Timestamped. Audit ready.
If no material gap is found, you retain validated confirmation of your current posture. If a gap is found, you reduce recovery exposure before an adversary tests those assumptions.
What is the core difference between Elastio and CyberSense?
CyberSense answers "does this data inside the vault look statistically anomalous." Elastio answers "does this file show any sign of ransomware" before data gets vaulted.
Where does CyberSense inspect data?
CyberSense runs analytics after data lands in the Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery vault. It can only inspect what has already been replicated into the vault.
Where does Elastio inspect data?
Elastio inspects backup data before it is replicated into the vault, so corrupted data never lands inside the isolated tier. The same Deep File Inspection optionally runs inside the vault in an isolated clean room.
What is Elastio's clean room inspection?
Elastio runs Deep File Inspection inside the vault in an isolated clean room. No new accounts in the vault. No persistent compute. Inspection completes, results are written back, and the clean room is torn down.
What is Elastio's false positive rate?
Elastio's Hunt engine produces fewer than 5 false positives per 10 million files inspected. It names the ransomware family, identifies the encryption pattern, and identifies the last proven clean copy to recover from. No interpretation step. No tuning.
Is CyberSense backup-agnostic?
No. CyberSense is tightly coupled to PowerProtect Data Domain and the Cyber Recovery workflow. Elastio is backup-agnostic and hunts across Commvault, Veeam, Rubrik, Cohesity, NetApp, S3, Blob, and AWS Backup.
Does CyberSense run cloud-native?
CyberSense has limited native cloud parity. It uses a per-server architecture with no cloud-native orchestration and an on-prem appliance footprint. Elastio is cloud-native and auto-scaling, with the same control across AWS, Azure, IBM Cloud, and on-prem.
Does Elastio require persistent compute inside the vault?
No. Elastio uses ephemeral compute with no persistent scanner infrastructure inside the vault. It auto-scales to zero when no Hunt jobs are queued and creates no new accounts or access paths into the vault.
All product capabilities are current as of May 2026 and sourced from public documentation. Elastio is not affiliated with or endorsed by Dell Technologies or Index Engines. CyberSense is a trademark of Index Engines.